Re: [DNSOP] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-12: (with COMMENT)

Ben, I am afraid that I forgot to ack your email with an agreement on all your points 😊 Regards -éric From: Benjamin Schwartz Date: Tuesday, 18 April 2023 at 13:20 To: Eric Vyncke Cc: The IESG , "draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-ht...@ietf.org" , "dnsop-cha...@ietf.org" , "dnsop@ietf.org" , Tim Wicin

Re: [DNSOP] Dnsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-16

Thank you, Vladimir, has you may have seen I have mentioned your reviews in my "NoObj" ballot (adding though other issues). Regards -éric On 27/12/2023, 17:13, "DNSOP on behalf of Vladimír Čunát via Datatracker" mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of nore...@ietf.org

Re: [DNSOP] Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting-07: (with COMMENT)

Hello Roy, Thanks for coming back to my previous ballot. It took me a while to bring it back from the level-2 cache ;-) I agree with you, the abstract is indeed clear. About the "SHOULD" without any documented exceptions, it is really unusual to do so but nothing that dramatic tough. Anyway, p

[DNSOP] Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4035 (8037)

/statement-iesg-iesg-processing-of-rfc-errata-for-the-ietf-stream-20210507/ From: Paul Hoffman Date: Tuesday, 30 July 2024 at 20:49 To: Elias Heftrig Cc: Rose, Scott W. (Fed) , Rob Austein , RFC Errata System , s...@isc.org , mas...@cs.colostate.edu , ek.i...@gmail.com , Eric Vyncke (evyncke

[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4035 (8037)

Elias, I will have to read erratum report 8038 (RFC6840) for a definitive answer, but the IESG statement and my explanations about erratum report 8037 probably apply. Regards -éric From: Elias Heftrig Date: Friday, 2 August 2024 at 17:29 To: Paul Hoffman , Eric Vyncke (evyncke) Cc: Rose

Re: [DNSOP] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-20: (with COMMENT)

Mark Thank you for your detailed answers. They make sense (and I learned quite a bit in the same shot) Regards -éric -Original Message- From: Mark Andrews Date: Tuesday, 14 April 2020 at 02:15 To: Eric Vyncke Cc: The IESG , Tim Wicinski , "draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-is...@ietf.or

Re: [DNSOP] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-12: (with COMMENT)

Thank you Duane for the quick reply and for taking into account my comments Regards -éric -Original Message- From: iesg on behalf of "Wessels, Duane" Date: Wednesday, 7 October 2020 at 22:08 To: Eric Vyncke Cc: "draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-dig...@ietf.org" , Tim Wicinski , "dnsop@ie

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-10: (with DISCUSS)

Paul, First , thank you for your reply. Second, your proposed change actually addresses my DISCUSS and will be happy to change my ballot in a NO OBJECTION once a revised I-D is published ;-) Regards -éric -Original Message- From: iesg on behalf of Paul Hoffman Date: Wednesday, 25

[DNSOP] FW: [Add] Last Call: (Service Binding Mapping for DNS Servers) to Proposed Standard

Dear DNSOP, As this ADD WG document relies on draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https from the DNSOP WG, as the responsible AD for the ADD WG, I will appreciate your review of this short IETF draft. Thank you very much in advance, Regards -éric On 24/06/2022, 19:26, "Add on behalf of The IESG" wrote:

Re: [DNSOP] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)

Badly worded of mine... Firewalls drop/dropped EDNS0 packets which was the core issue -éric On 07/07/16 03:35, "Ray Bellis" wrote: > > >On 07/07/2016 10:31, Benoit Claise wrote: > >> Based on my operational experience, I have seen multiple DNSSEC >> packets dropped by firewalls because they try

Re: [DNSOP] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)

Wes, Sorry for late reply, I was part-time on vacations and part-time too busy. Regarding the EDNS0, it was more related to flow of the I-D where EDNS0 is introduced rather late in the document. But, I am fine with leaving the document as it is. Thanks for the modified pieces of text: they are g

[DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1-02

are, but let’s write it clearly in the shepherd’s write-up). Regards -éric From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) Date: Monday, 17 February 2025 at 16:02 To: dnsop@ietf.org Subject: [DNSOP] AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1-02 Dear all, Thanks for your patience as I was on vacations when the

[DNSOP] Re: Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-06: (with COMMENT)

succession of , A requests but also for a 3rd one coming SVCB before the & A ;-) -éric From: Shumon Huque Date: Friday, 14 February 2025 at 19:21 To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) Cc: The IESG , draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existe...@ietf.org , dnsop-cha...@ietf.org , dnsop@ietf

[DNSOP] AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1-02

Dear all, Thanks for your patience as I was on vacations when the publication of this I-D was requested. As the DNSOP responsible AD is also an author, I was selected as the acting responsible AD for this I-D. Hence, here are some comments that I want to be addressed (either by replying to me o

[DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1-02

Oops again, just browsed through draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis-05 that modifies the IANA registries, so my comments on section 5 are moot and can be ignored. Regards -éric From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) Date: Monday, 17 February 2025 at 16:16 To: dnsop@ietf.org Subject: [DNSOP] Re: AD review of

[DNSOP] AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost-02

Dear all, Thanks for your patience as I was on vacations when the publication of this I-D was requested. As the DNSOP responsible AD is also an author, I was selected as the acting responsible AD for this I-D. Hence, here are some comments that I want to be addressed (either by replying to this

[DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis-05

Hello Warren, Thanks for the quick reply and revised I-D. We agree on all points, and I will proceed shortly with the IETF Last Call, some more comments below as EV> Regards -éric From: Warren Kumari Date: Tuesday, 18 February 2025 at 23:35 To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) Cc: dnsop@ietf.

[DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost-02

the text. -éric From: Warren Kumari Date: Tuesday, 18 February 2025 at 23:39 To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) Cc: dnsop@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DNSOP] AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost-02 On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 11:15 AM, Eric Vyncke mailto:evyncke=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org

[DNSOP] AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis-05

Dear all, Thanks for your patience as I was on vacations when the publication of this I-D was requested. As the DNSOP responsible AD is also an author, I was selected as the acting responsible AD for this I-D. Hence, here are some comments that I want to be addressed (either by replying to me o

[DNSOP] Re: Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

I-D). Regards -éric From: Peter Thomassen Date: Thursday, 6 March 2025 at 16:41 To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) , The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-not...@ietf.org , dnsop-cha...@ietf.org , dnsop@ietf.org , tjw.i...@gmail.com , peter.van.d...@powerdns.com Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Éric Vynck

[DNSOP] Re: Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

at 02:56 To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) , The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-not...@ietf.org , dnsop@ietf.org , tjw.i...@gmail.com , peter.van.d...@powerdns.com Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Re: Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Hi Éric,