Hello Ben,
picking one of the points in the thread and leaving the rest to another
subthread:
> > We have a paper on the performance benefits just accepted for CoNEXT,
> > which we will cite once it is published. An early pre-print (the final
> > paper underwent some major revisions though) is av
Hello Rich,
> I'm also surprised by the choice of mnemonic, which is very short. If
> the extra 7 octets of "coap-dtls" would make a material difference in
> some use case, perhaps the draft should explain that.
This was mentioned just very briefly during the tls-reg-review[1], so
I'm happy to
