[DNSOP] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-03

This is a combined Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review. Boilerplate for both follows ... I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at: . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last

Re: [DNSOP] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-03

nodes". Of course the "sequence of identifiers" in an FQDN identifies a "sequence of nodes". Everything else in the response looks reasonable to me. Thanks, --David > -Original Message- > From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:paul.hoff...@vpnc.org] > Sent: Mon

Re: [DNSOP] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-03

hat work? Yes, that works with a minor typo fix: "sequence of nodes identifier" -> "sequence of nodes identified" And we agree on the primary point of my original comment. Thanks, --David > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Sullivan [mailto:a...@anvilwalrusden

Re: [DNSOP] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-04

SSEC- aware" and "DNSSEC-unaware" are used in later RFCs, but never formally defined. The resulting modified definition still doesn't define anything :-). Is it trying to say that these two terms are undefined and should not be used, with use of the more specific te