Re: [DNSOP] [Doh] New I-D: draft-reid-doh-operator

> On Mar 9, 2019, at 10:48 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > > Also, I think that this topic would be better discussed in the DNSOP WG - > the DoH charter (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/doh/about/ > ) talks about: > "The primary focus of this working gr

Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC operational issues long term

> On Nov 16, 2016, at 18:56, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > > So if it's manufactured the day before a new key is publically released, when > is the key material it has built in no longer viable to have successful > DNSSEC validation? Do the first (only) bootstrap without validation if validatio

Re: [DNSOP] Would you please review our draft on deploying new DNSSEC crypto algorithms?

> On Nov 24, 2016, at 01:05, Matthijs Mekking wrote: > > In section 2.1.1 there is a note on an in 2016 standards non-compliant > resolver. Having RFCs (to be) note that other RFCs are not safe to assume its > implemented is a bit ridiculous to me. It is a given that there are bugs, and > thu

Re: [DNSOP] [dns-privacy] FW: New Version Notification for draft-pan-dnsop-edns-isp-location-00

> On Mar 20, 2017, at 0:49, Lanlan Pan wrote: > > Everyone has known that physical location and the topology of content > delivery DO NOT MATCH. > As last mail reply to Warren, my proposal can offer the SAME critical > information for authoritative server to make tailored response decision as

Re: [DNSOP] [dns-privacy] FW: New Version Notification for draft-pan-dnsop-edns-isp-location-00

> On Mar 21, 2017, at 21:30 , Lanlan Pan wrote: > > See this example of ECS : Which CDNs support edns-client-subnet?  > , they > map the ECS client subnet into the geolocation (what EIL give), and then make > DNS decision.