Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-belyavskiy-rfc5933-bis

Hello Ondrej, > 16 июня 2020 г., в 10:52, Ondřej Surý написал(а): > > > > I consider the previous GOST standardization for DNSSEC to be a fiasco. I do not think that _standartization_ was a fiasco. The implementation - definitely was one. That has an explanation, when RFC5933 was published,

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Call for Adoption: draft-belyavskiy-rfc5933-bis

> 19 июня 2020 г., в 21:17, Dick Franks написал(а): > > On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 18:12, Paul Hoffman > wrote: > On Jun 19, 2020, at 9:26 AM, Eric Rescorla > wrote: > > What's your reasoning for why there needs to be community review before >

[DNSOP] Draft draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis-00

Hello, during WG adoption process there were several people who agreed to review this draft. This is a gentle reminder to whose who expressed the willingness to review (as well as to any other person who wish to perform the review) to do it and to supply their comments or suggestions, whic

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Call for Adoption: draft-hoffman-dnssec-iana-cons

> 4 янв. 2021 г., в 19:20, Stephen Farrell > написал(а): > > > Hiya, > > On 04/01/2021 16:05, Paul Wouters wrote: >> While asking is fair, you would also have to define what you >> do based on the outcome of that ask. You left that out, > > I don't think I did omit that. My stated reason to

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Call for Adoption: draft-hoffman-dnssec-iana-cons

at would reduce the level of concern here. > Zones and resolvers could add more algorithms with no risk of weakening > their security posture. > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 3:24 AM Василий Долматов <mailto:vdolma...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > >

Re: [DNSOP] Moving WG documents forward

> 31 июля 2021 г., в 19:38, Paul Hoffman написал(а): > > On Jul 31, 2021, at 4:45 AM, Benno Overeinder wrote: >> For the individual drafts, the DNSOP chairs will contact the authors and >> discuss the way forward with the WG. > > During the meeting, there was a call for more transparency, an