[DNSOP] Re: Paul Wouters' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-06: (with COMMENT)

2025-02-23 Thread Shumon Huque
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 10:01 PM Paul Wouters via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-06: Yes > Thanks for your review, Paul. > Just a few comments: > > Since NODATA responses

[DNSOP] Re: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2025-02-23 Thread Shumon Huque
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 3:17 AM Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-06: Discuss > Thank you for your review, Murray. ---

[DNSOP] Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-public-resolver-errors-01.txt

2025-02-23 Thread Loganaden Velvindron
Interesting proposal. "Allowing DNS resolvers to inject user-visible messages brings unique challenges. Because DNS resolvers are often automatically configured by unknown networks and DNS responses are unauthenticated, these messages can come from untrusted parties -- including attackers (e.g.,

[DNSOP] Re: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2025-02-23 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 3:35 AM Shumon Huque wrote: > (2) Section 3.1 Paragraph 2: >> >> The Next Domain Name field SHOULD be set to the immediate lexicographic >> successor of the QNAME. The Type Bit Maps field MUST only have the bits >> set >> for the following RR Types: RRSIG, NSEC, and