[DNSOP] Re: The DNSOP WG has placed draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2025-02-09 Thread Momoka Yamamoto
Thank you to everyone who has expressed support for the draft DNS IPv6 Transport Operational Guidelines (3901bis). We have updated the draft based on the feedback received during this adoption call. Momoka Y Internet-Draft draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-07.txt is now available. It is a > work item of

[DNSOP] Re: Is .INTERNAL a special use domain name?

2025-02-09 Thread John Levine
It appears that Michael De Roover said: >Hello! I appreciate that IANA is thinking about relegating a suffix like this >for internal-only use. They're not thinking about it. They did it. See https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/proposed-top-level-domain-string-for-private-use-24

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-07.txt

2025-02-09 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-07.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations (DNSOP) WG of the IETF. Title: DNS IPv6 Transport Operational Guidelines Authors: 山本 桃歌 Tobias Fiebig Name:draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-07.txt Pages

[DNSOP] Re: Is .INTERNAL a special use domain name?

2025-02-09 Thread Michael De Roover
On Tuesday, February 4, 2025 10:49:29 PM CET Kim Davies wrote: > Hi folks, > > We have published a new version of the draft intended to document the > .internal top-level domain. > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-davies-internal-tld/) > When we presented this work in Dublin, there was a