On Feb 3, 2025, at 05:33, Pawel Kowalik wrote:
>
> This is an interesting approach to solve this problem with potentially low
> barrier entry.
Thanks! (For those in DNSOP who don't know, Pawel is a co-author on the
DomainConnect draft.)
> I think few properties of this solution would be worth
I have made many updates to the draft based on the input so far. Please see the
extended use case and design parts, as well as the other additions y'all have
suggested.
--Paul Hoffman
A new version of Internet-Draft draft-hoffman-duj-01.txt has been successfully
submitted by Paul Hoffman and po
On Monday, February 3, 2025 10:19:59 PM CET Paul Hoffman wrote:
> I have made many updates to the draft based on the input so far. Please see
> the extended use case and design parts, as well as the other additions
> y'all have suggested.
> --Paul Hoffman
Hello,
I have read your draft revision,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 9:55 AM Shumon Huque wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> At the last DNSOP meeting in Dublin, I already made some remarks at the
> mic that the draft is in need of some cleanup and reorganization. A lot of
> the content has grown by accretion in response to
Reviewer: Giuseppe Fioccola
Review result: Has Nits
This document extends the use of DNS NOTIFY which is described in RFC 1996. It
is well written and clear for its scope, but I have few suggestions.
I think that Appendix A on "Efficiency and Convergence Issues in DNS Scanning"
is quite relevant
Dear WG,
As briefly mentioned at the last DNSOP WG meeting in Dublin, we are
planning an interim meeting to present and discuss a set of related
drafts on DNSSEC signing and zone publication.
Johan Stenstam and his colleagues/collaborators have published and
presented a number of drafts at s
On Feb 1, 2025, at 16:47, Robert Edmonds wrote:
>
> Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> On Feb 1, 2025, at 15:49, Robert Edmonds wrote:
>>> If comments aren't allowed, what about parens, embedded newlines, \DDD
>>> and \X escapes, etc.?
>>
>> None of that; I'll add more prohibitions. Thanks again for asking
On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 11:21 PM Patrick Mevzek via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> Reviewer: Patrick Mevzek
> Review result: Ready
>
> I have reviewed previously draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-05
> at
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/pSqTcLhunIAULyz4v8ByXhp7cWg
