Greetings again. The following is a proposal to help end-users who are told
"please enter this record in your zone to prove your existence". It simplifies
the process without automating it; in short, it makes copy-and-pasting more
likely to work, particularly for the _label names that are being
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 8:36 PM Wessels, Duane wrote:
> Willem/Shumon/Paul,
>
> Here’s some comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-08.txt
>
Thanks Duane!
> >Resolvers should also periodically revalidate the
> >child delegation by re-querying the parent zone at the expiration of
>
Moin,
On Thu, 2025-01-30 at 08:44 -0600, Nick Buraglio wrote:
> I support adoption, this is important work and supports the trend to
> increase IPv6 use.
Thanks!
> Agree that this should be removed. It freezes the draft in a time in
> which 1. is constantly evolving, and 2. is counter to the cu
I support adoption, this is important work and supports the trend to
increase IPv6 use.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 12:59 PM wrote:
> I strongly support adoption. Additional commentary in-line.
>
> Thanks,
> Tommy
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tobias Fiebig
> > Sent: Monday, January 27
Am 24.01.25 um 21:45 schrieb IETF Secretariat:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis/
Hello,
I support adoption.
4.1:
Avoiding Fragmentation:
you mean "Avoiding IP fragmentation"?
clearance is important, as the draft is also about "Namespace Fragmentation"
some wo
