The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG
(dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'Generalized DNS Notifications'
as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substant
Tim Wicinski has requested publication of draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1-02 as
Proposed Standard on behalf of the DNSOP working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1/
___
DNSOP ma
Hi,
The chairs gave this an extra few days and have seen no objections to the
recent changes.
We’re comfortable with letting stand the previous decision that we’ve got
consensus to advance the draft.
Thanks authors for working out this last bit of process.
Warren, I see this draft on the tele
On Jan 23, 2025, at 12:22, Tim Wicinski via Datatracker
wrote:
>
> Tim Wicinski has requested publication of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis-03 as
> Informational on behalf of the DNSOP working group.
I am disappointed that the discussion of changing the requirements for
MAY-level additions able
All
I've gone back and reviewed all the emails on rfc8624-bis and it does seem
like everything has been addressed during the WGLC and we have consensus on
progressing this forward. I don't see any editorial changes the authors
needs to address at this time.
thanks
tim
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at
Tim Wicinski has requested publication of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis-03 as
Informational on behalf of the DNSOP working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis/
___
DNSOP mailing li
Tim Wicinski has requested publication of draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost-02
as Proposed Standard on behalf of the DNSOP working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost/
___
