[DNSOP] Re: DNSOPWorking Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1

2025-01-17 Thread Stefan Ubbink
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:41:47 -0800 Wes Hardaker wrote: > Stefan Ubbink writes: > > > I do not see the change in > > https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-gost/blob/main/README.txt > > . Am I missing something? > > Nope, you weren't. Maybe Warren didn't push the changes.

[DNSOP] Re: DNSOPDNSOP[Ext] Algorithm requirements for Section 2 of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis

2025-01-17 Thread Wes Hardaker
Tim Wicinski writes: > >I think only a document that is Standards Track is needed to change the > >SHOULD or RECOMMENDED values as a group - eg talking about all the The good news is that I think everyone is generally aligned on standards track being required for higher level SHOULD/RECO