[DNSOP] Re: [TLS] Re: Re: Re: AD review draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech

2024-10-08 Thread Philip Homburg
> Distribution trimmed down > to just dnsop, where the question is most pertinent. > > Paul Wouters writes: > > Of course even better is using RFC 7901 Chain Query and run the few > > signature validations yourself. > > Related, is there any notable software out there that does 7901? > I started

[DNSOP] Re: [TLS] Re: Re: Re: AD review draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech

2024-10-08 Thread Eric Rescorla
I agree that you can't trust a resolver that you only know about from ADD. -Ekr On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 8:31 AM Paul Wouters wrote: > I agree with your points. Our only difference of opinion seems to be about > how much one should trust a TRR. > I still prefer to need to trust them the least po

[DNSOP] Re: [TLS] Re: Re: Re: AD review draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech

2024-10-08 Thread Paul Wouters
I agree with your points. Our only difference of opinion seems to be about how much one should trust a TRR. I still prefer to need to trust them the least possible, meaning I would want DNSSEC validation to at least detect tampering at the TRR. With more ECH deployed, and less visibility of SNI, th