Deirdre Connolly wrote on 2024-09-30 10:59:
> We could add a recommendation like "Clients using ECH SHOULD select a
DNS resolver that they trust to preserve the confidentiality of their
queries and return authentic answers, and communicate using an
authenticated and confidential transport",
Thanks for the information. I would recommend adding at least the
expansion of the acronyms to the RFC.
Personally, I am busy with a 3D printer, no time for drones :(
--
Bob Harold
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 11:36 AM Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
> DRIP - Drone Remote ID Protocol -- The name given to
CAA should be expanded on first use.
DRIP expansion (in the abstract), I will leave to our chairs to comment.
On 10/1/24 13:01, Bob Harold wrote:
Thanks for the information. I would recommend adding at least the
expansion of the acronyms to the RFC.
Personally, I am busy with a 3D printer, n
DRIP - Drone Remote ID Protocol -- The name given to our IETF effort and
thus our workgroup and how the greater aviation world knows about us!
CAA - Civil Aviation Authority -- Pretty much each country signature to
the ICAO treaty (though ICAO is a UN agency, it predates it, has its own
treaty
> Yes, you send multiple queries. For QTYPE I would do this after
> I have got the response so one can set the correct expectation for
> the rcode, (NOERROR vs NXDOMAIN).
>
> For opcode one is looking for NOTIMP.
The draft says 'Servers that do not tolerate unknown values will fail to
interopera
I can generally follow the draft. DNS is certainly an attractive
distributed database to use for all sorts of data.
Most acronyms are defined the first time that they are used, which is very
helpful. Two that I did not see defined and did not recognize
DRIP
CAA
--
Bob Harold
On Fri, Sep 27, 2
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 3:12 PM Ben Schwartz wrote:
> OK, done: https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech/pull/16
>
Looks good other than some minor suggestions I made.
Thanks for correctly pointing out that DNSSEC doesn't help you when you are
dealing with privacy and untrusted DNS serv
> On 1 Oct 2024, at 18:51, Philip Homburg wrote:
>
>> Yes, you send multiple queries. For QTYPE I would do this after
>> I have got the response so one can set the correct expectation for
>> the rcode, (NOERROR vs NXDOMAIN).
>>
>> For opcode one is looking for NOTIMP.
>
> The draft says 'Ser
