On Aug 20, 2024, at 02:38, Mahesh Jethanandani via Datatracker
wrote:
> I am not a DNS expert, and was wondering if there is a definition for
> "recursive resolvers", and if not, can it be defined here? The idea would be
> to
> understand how they are different from other kinds of resolvers suc
That could be a solution, but I doubt if that is a good one. The Label
Type has the smallest range of all DNS parameters. Most private use
ranges appear as part of in 16-bit (65536) parameters or 8-bit (256)
parameters. Label Type is actually 6-bits (64), assuming you want to use
10xx for i
Gunter Van de Velde has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-06: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please re
Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-06: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-06: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://w
This is an omnibus reply to the messages on this thread. I believe that the -04
draft is complete, but responses to the replies below may change that. The
draft is currently in Warren's hands, so he gets to decide whether a new draft
is needed for any of those points.
--Paul Hoffman
On Aug 10
> On 20 Aug 2024, at 20:32, Gunter Van de Velde via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Gunter Van de Velde has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-06: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in
Hi Paul -
I'm confused from your responses below - is this a WG document where the
WG gets to decide, or is this an IANA document (like the one it was
replacing) where IANA gets to decide? I *think* I saw you argue both
ways in your response below.
I wish I'd seen this during or before the
