Hi,
On 5/7/24 09:33, Peter Thomassen wrote:
Hi,
On 5/2/24 19:59, David Dong via RT wrote:
Following up on this; does the group agree that "_dnssec" is OK?
Looking at what's been said in this thread:
- Two people have proposed to change the label, current proposal: _dnssec
- Two implementers
Hi Erik,
Thanks for your review!
On 5/5/24 00:18, Erik Kline via Datatracker wrote:
## Comments
### S7
* Should there be some kind of registration or reservation for the "_dsboot"
meaning and usage described in this document?
The authors were wondering as well.
We figured that unlike in
On 07. 05. 24 2:54, C. M. Heard wrote:
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 6:59 AM Petr Špaček wrote:
Warren asked implementers to provide feedback on the current text, so
I'm doing just that.
[ ... ]
3.1. Recommendations for UDP responders
R1. UDP responders SHOULD NOT use IPv6 fragmentation [RFC8200
Colleagues,
Back in October 2023, the WG requested publication of "The DNS Zone Version
(ZONEVERSION) Option"
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion/).
When our AD reviewed it before taking it to IETF Last Call, he felt there were
some issues that needed to be addresse
