> That's cache poisoning. Search for "Eugene Kashpureff" to learn all
> about it.
There is a relation in the sense that checking RRs for relevance to the
query is mentioned as a partial defense against cache poisoning in RFC
3833, section 2.3.
Note however some differences:
1. Caching of unrequ
Dear DNSOP WG,
I closed the doodle poll to select a suitable day and time. The
selected day and time is *January 30, 2024, 17:00-18:00 UTC*.
I will schedule the interim in the datatracker and more information
about the interim meeting will appear on the mailing list.
Best regards,
-- Ben
On Jan 17, 2024, at 05:15, Bellebaum, Thomas
wrote:
>
> 1. Caching of unrequested RRs would actually be fine, if they are
> properly signed. At worst, a resolver would cache irrelevant records.
This is not entirely true. By tailoring someone’s cache you might be able to
track them. There is
Reviewer: Matt Brown
Review result: Ready
I have been selected as the DNS Directorate reviewer for this draft. The DNS
Directorate seeks to review all DNS or DNS-related drafts as they pass through
IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose
of the review is to pr
> On 17 Jan 2024, at 20:42, Matt Brown via Datatracker via dnsdir
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Matt Brown
> Review result: Ready
>
> I have been selected as the DNS Directorate reviewer for this draft.
> The draft itself is clear and understandable. Both the language and the
> substance of th
