Hi all,
I have submitted a new draft to discuss the faked answer returned from the
recursive resolver.
Your comments are appreciated.
-- Forwarded message -
发件人：
Date: 2024年1月10日周三 16:11
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-pan-dnsop-explicit-forged-answer-signal-00.txt
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 4:19 AM Lanlan Pan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have submitted a new draft to discuss the faked answer returned from the
> recursive resolver.
>
> Your comments are appreciated.
>
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> 发件人：
> Date: 2024年1月10日周三 16:11
> Subject: New Versio
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024, Lanlan Pan wrote:
I have submitted a new draft to discuss the faked answer returned from the
recursive resolver.
Your comments are appreciated.
As I've said during the discussions on RBL and an updated version for
RBL, if these things are done "for the user", the best th
On Jan 9, 2024, at 19:17, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> Perhaps a recommendation could be to check with ZONEMD and do an AXFR,
>> eg recomend implementing RFC 8806 - "Running a Root Server Local to a
>> Resolver".
>> Comes with added bonuses on top of a signature on all the root glue.
>>
>> I still thi
> On 9 Jan 2024, at 01:54, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> All
>
>
> This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis
> "Initializing a DNS Resolver with Priming Queries"
>
> Current versions of the draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc
Let me try that again with proper indentation.
> On 9 Jan 2024, at 01:54, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> All
>
>
> This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis
> "Initializing a DNS Resolver with Priming Queries"
>
> Current versions of the draft is available here:
> https:/
On Jan 10, 2024, at 14:05, Roy Arends wrote:
> I support this documents.
Thanks!
> Furthermore, here are some comments:
>
>2. Description of Priming
>
>Priming is described in Sections 5.3.2 and 5.3.3 of [RFC1034]. The
>scenario used in that description, that of a recur
i think you mean RPZ here.
Paul Wouters wrote on 2024-01-10 07:01:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024, Lanlan Pan wrote:
I have submitted a new draft to discuss the faked answer returned from
the recursive resolver.
Your comments are appreciated.
As I've said during the discussions on RBL and an updated
I support publication. The remainder feel like nits which would get
resolved in editor queue.
I discussed the priming issue with Paul H privately and I think his
response covered my concerns. Basically, if you run hyperlocal root,
it subsumes the functionality of the cache priming activity, but it
Thanks Bob, I will revised it.
Bob Harold 于2024年1月10日周三 22:23写道：
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 4:19 AM Lanlan Pan wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have submitted a new draft to discuss the faked answer returned from
>> the recursive resolver.
>>
>> Your comments are appreciated.
>>
>>
>> -- F
On Jan 10, 2024, at 20:55, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> i think you mean RPZ here.
Yes I did. Thank you.
Paul
>
> Paul Wouters wrote on 2024-01-10 07:01:
>>> On Wed, 10 Jan 2024, Lanlan Pan wrote:
>>> I have submitted a new draft to discuss the faked answer returned from the
>>> recursive resolver
Thanks Paul.
Paul Wouters 于2024年1月10日周三 23:01写道：
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2024, Lanlan Pan wrote:
>
> > I have submitted a new draft to discuss the faked answer returned from
> the recursive resolver.
> >
> > Your comments are appreciated.
>
> As I've said during the discussions on RBL and an updated v
12 matches
Mail list logo
