Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis (2nd round)

2023-12-29 Thread Paul Wouters
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023, Paul Hoffman wrote: On Dec 28, 2023, at 13:34, Tim Wicinski wrote: All, We wrapped up the second working group last call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis with no comments pro or con. The chairs can only assume the working group is not interested in moving this work for

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis (2nd round)

2023-12-29 Thread Paul Wouters
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023, Paul Wouters wrote: I've missed these calls, my apologies. I think the document is almost ready to proceed, but contains some markers of [[unresolved discussion]] that obviously needs resolving (and should have been resolved before doing a WGLC? :) Obviously I made a mist

Re: [DNSOP] Paul Wouters' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-16: (with COMMENT)

2023-12-29 Thread Paul Vixie
Paul Wouters via Datatracker wrote on 2023-12-29 11:37: Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-16: Yes -- COMMENT:

[DNSOP] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-16

2023-12-29 Thread Barry Leiba via Datatracker
Reviewer: Barry Leiba Review result: Ready with Nits Thanks for addressing most comments from my earlier review. One remains, and I didn’t see an email response about it, so I don’t know whether there was a reason not to make a change or if it just got overlooked: — Section 7.2 — If a UDP re

Re: [DNSOP] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-16

2023-12-29 Thread Paul Vixie
Barry Leiba via Datatracker wrote on 2023-12-29 19:40: Reviewer: Barry Leiba Review result: Ready with Nits Thanks for addressing most comments from my earlier review. One remains, and I didn’t see an email response about it, so I don’t know whether there was a reason not to make a change or