Hi folks,
Here is the summary of adoption call opinion for
draft-momoka-v6ops-ipv6-only-resolver-01, and the planned action:
* Against (the number in front of each name is the order the opinion was
expressed)
* 1. Nick Hillard: more appropriate to have the draft go through one of
t
I see that draft-dnsop-dnssec-extension-pkix is included on the IETF117 dnsop
agenda.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dnsop-dnssec-extension-pkix/
I haven't seen prior discussion of this item on the list, and,
personally, rather suspect it unlikely to gain meaningful support from
the
On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 03:06:35PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> I see that draft-dnsop-dnssec-extension-pkix is included on the IETF117 dnsop
> agenda.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dnsop-dnssec-extension-pkix/
>
> I haven't seen prior discussion of this item on the list, and
> On 17 Jul 2023, at 05:53, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 03:06:35PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> I see that draft-dnsop-dnssec-extension-pkix is included on the IETF117
>> dnsop agenda.
>>
>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dnsop-dnssec-extension-pkix/
>>
On Jul 16, 2023, at 12:06 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> Would it possible to defer discussion of this document to such time as
> some evidence of support emerges, and in the meantime use the timeslot
> for more realistically productive proposals?
+1. The 15 minutes allocated to this draft would be
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 07:06:49PM +, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-regext-epp-delete-bcp/
>
> The draft includes descriptions of current known practices and
> suggests that some should be avoided, some are candidates for "best",
> and there are o
