Dear DNSOP,
Thank you for the very helpful feedback provided by several people on the -00
revision back in November.
Johan and I made changes to the document that incorporate the insights from the
crowd, and resolved some other issues. The result is -01, attached below. If
you are interested,
Hi,
LGTM.
I’ve opened a small PR to just update the DoQ references now there is an RFC:
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis/pull/12
Regards
Sara.
> On 17 Feb 2023, at 15:51, Benno Overeinder wrote:
>
> Dear DNSOP WG,
>
> Following the latest consultation with the
Dear DNSOP WG,
Following lengthy discussion, including the latest consultation with the.
Working Group on bailiwick and in-domain/sibling name servers terminology, the
authors and chairs believe this document is ready for Working Group Last Call.
As described earlier, draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bi
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 09:15:35PM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> There are many more. We see a steady stream of sibling-glue-related
> lookup failures, that are only resolved after going to the authoritative
> source for the actual IP addresses of the nameservers in question.
I undertook a mor
