Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Questions / concerns with draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https (in RFC Editor queue)

2022-09-29 Thread Erik Nygren
One item discussed above that the authors would like to clarify is to be consistent about whether the alternative endpoint name (TargetName) is a hostname or a domain name. In all but one place in the doc we refer to it as a "domain name" but there is one reference that calls it a "hostname". In

[DNSOP] Question regarding draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-10 sections 4.1 and 6

2022-09-29 Thread Klaus Malorny
Hi all, I have a small question in respect to section 4.1 (DNS Server Behavior /Authoritative servers) and section 6 (SVCB-compatible). I have to admit that I do not yet fully understand the current draft (having neglected following the discussion on the draft in the past). So please forgive

Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-10 sections 4.1 and 6

2022-09-29 Thread Ben Schwartz
The answer is #2: the same as the QTYPE. The "compatible" RR types have the same RDATA format and processing logic, but they do not interact with each other. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org ht