Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Questions / concerns with draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https (in RFC Editor queue)

2022-09-12 Thread Warren Kumari
Hi all, Firstly, and most importantly, thank y'all for keeping this civil, friendly and productive; I really appreciate it. I've (informally) checked with the IESG on the proposed change in the PR and also including Erik's proposed operational note ("Some implementations may not allow A or r

[DNSOP] DNSOP WG interim-2022-dnsop-02 meeting agenda (September 26, 2022)

2022-09-12 Thread Benno Overeinder
Hi all, As mentioned on the mailing list, we have settled on a date for the DNSOP WG virtual interim meeting on Monday, September 26, from 15:00 to 16:00 UTC. The agenda for the interim is: * Administrivia - Agenda Bashing, Blue Sheets, etc, 5 min * Current Working Group Business - DNS

[DNSOP] DNS Directorate...

2022-09-12 Thread Warren Kumari
Hi there all, At IETF 114 I mentioned that Eric Vynke and I were planning on creating a DNS Directorate. Unfortunately we got a little busy, and so it took a bit longer than expected, but we've finally had a chance to write up a "charter" (below). A number of people have already kindly offered t

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-01.txt

2022-09-12 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. Title : Negative Caching of DNS Resolution Failures Authors : Duane Wessels W

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-01.txt

2022-09-12 Thread Wessels, Duane
This draft has been updated based on recent feedback. The primary change is that the new version is less prescriptive about how the resolution failure negative cache should work. e.g., rather than saying "Resolution failures MUST be cached against the specific query tuple…” it now says "Resolv