On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 16:45 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > On 16 Apr 2022, at 05:24, Blacka, David <
> > davidb=40verisign@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > RFC 4955
Wrt to the assignment of additional numbers for experiment, RFC 4955
says in Sec. 5:
> Alternately, the experiment MAY use the Ob
Suzanne Woolf wrote:
As some of you have noted, the thread under the subject "DNSSEC as a
Best Current Practice" has included some inappropriate posts, not
consistent with the IETF Code of Conduct or guidance on keeping the
WG mailing list professional and productive. A DNSOP mailing list
par
Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
: Third, all the CAs, including TLDs, pursuing commercial
: success have very good appearance using such words as
: "HSMs" or "four eyes minimum". That is, you can't
: compare actual operational/physical strength from
: their formal documents.
This is an anecdote
see below inline.
Masataka Ohta wrote on 2022-04-21 05:59:
Suzanne Woolf wrote:
...
That's simply wrong.
As I, to confirm the freedom speech in IETF, explicitly confirmed
destructive harsh criticisms are not "unprofessional" (w.r.t.
the code) in
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : The "ZONEVERSION" EDNS option for the version token
of a RR's zone
Authors : Hugo Salgado
Dear DNSOP group.
We've been working on a new version of the rrserial draft, this time
with some pretty substantive changes, including a name change to the
extension: ZONEVERSION.
This new draft expands the original meaning of the extension from
"a copy of the SOA serial", to "a zone version ident
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Automatic DNSSEC Bootstrapping using Authenticated
Signals from the Zone's Operator
Authors :
