On 07/03/2022 19.06, Wes Hardaker wrote:
The -05 version sounds clearer here than -04 ("not respond" above) or
-03. Thanks.
You should check -06 too -- I restructured it to read better (IMHO)
Right, I agree that -06 is better.
___
DNSOP mailing list
Dear dnsop,
This draft describes a mechanism for automatic provisioning of zones
among authoritative name servers by way of distributing a catalog of
those zones encoded in a regular DNS zone.
This version's focus was getting ready for WGLC.
This version of the draft deals solely with catalog zo
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
Subject: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-02.txt
This document looks good. Some comments:
In fact, the Extensible Provisioning
Protocol (EPP) [RFC5731], that is often used by TLDs to configure
delegation paramete
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, John Levine wrote:
This draft needs a lot of work but I think it could be worth adopting.
More detailed feedback and/or proposed text is welcomed :)
Paul
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinf
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 1:04 PM Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
>
> > Subject: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-02.txt
>
> This document looks good. Some comments:
>
> In fact, the Extensible Provisioning
> Protocol (EPP) [RFC57
