On 02/11/2021 20:00, Roman Danyliw wrote:
> I believe that if this draft is going to be the BCP to discuss DNS
> over TCP, all of the flavors of DNS over TCP need to be covered.
I disagree, strongly.
The properties of DNS over TCP are well understood, and DNS over TLS is
(to a first approxima
On Nov 2, 2021, at 16:00, Roman Danyliw wrote:
> I believe that if this draft is going to be the BCP to discuss DNS over TCP,
> all of the flavors of DNS over TCP need to be covered.
I think it's sloppy to characterise DoH as a flavour of DNS over TCP, given
that the H part doesn't necessarily
On Nov 3, 2021, at 08:49, Joe Abley wrote:
> If there is any concern about DoH not receiving equitable treatment compared
> to DoT, I think it's sufficient simply to observe that DoH is a horse of a
> different colour and move on.
(Those who are not familiar with that final phrase could perh
On 01/11/2021 18.29, Michael StJohns wrote:
Section 2 - "their definition should specify..." - this is obviously a
must and is guidance to the IANA for interpreting registrations. E.g.
lack of this data has to result in a rejected registration request.
Section 2.1 - "Key names should contai
All,
The DNSOP WG agenda for IETF 112 has been published, see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/112/materials/agenda-112-dnsop-00.
Best regards,
Suzanne
Tim
Benno
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
