All
The Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-iana-cons ended
last week, and we've filtered through the comments both pro and con.
We feel there is rough consensus to move this forward.
thanks
Benno/Suzanne/Tim
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 11:29 AM Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> All
>
> Th
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to h
Suhas, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this
document.
Lars
On 2021-6-7, at 9:13, Suhas Nandakumar via Datatracker wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Suhas Nandakumar
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-10: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https:
Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Tim Wicinski has requested publication of draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-iana-cons-02
as None on behalf of the DNSOP working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-iana-cons/
___
DNSOP mailing l
On Aug 24, 2021, at 5:23 AM, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
wrote:
> == DISCUSS ==
>
> -- Section 2.1 --
> I support Erik Kline's COMMENT on this and am raising it to a blocking
> DISCUSS.
>
> A/ in all the discussion in the last §, a would have the same benefit
> when
> compared to a NS QT
Paul,
First , thank you for your reply.
Second, your proposed change actually addresses my DISCUSS and will be happy to
change my ballot in a NO OBJECTION once a revised I-D is published ;-)
Regards
-éric
-Original Message-
From: iesg on behalf of Paul Hoffman
Date: Wednesday, 25
