Re: [DNSOP] Dropping the draft "The DELEGATION_ONLY DNSKEY flag"

2021-08-10 Thread John Levine
It appears that Paul Wouters said: >On Thu, 5 Aug 2021, Tim Wicinski wrote: > >> Subject: [DNSOP] Dropping the draft "The DELEGATION_ONLY DNSKEY flag" > >> This came up in the poll, but also the discussion on priorities.  There >> seems to be >> strong feelings on dropping this draft.   We adopt

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Dropping the draft "The DELEGATION_ONLY DNSKEY flag"

2021-08-10 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Aug 9, 2021, at 1:34 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > I understand some people feel the experiment has no value to them. As far as I can tell after reviewing the archives, none of the people who supported moving the "powerbind" draft to be a WG item indicated that the draft had any value to them. N

[DNSOP] Possible greater value for draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation

2021-08-10 Thread Paul Hoffman
Greetings again. In the DPRIVE WG, we are discussing a proposal that would make encrypting transport on a first lookup more likely using a DS hack. Whether or not that becomes a WG item in DPRIVE, it reminded me that DNSOP had not finished with draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation, and that this dra

Re: [DNSOP] Possible greater value for draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation

2021-08-10 Thread Shumon Huque
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 1:55 PM Paul Hoffman wrote: > Greetings again. In the DPRIVE WG, we are discussing a proposal that would > make encrypting transport on a first lookup more likely using a DS hack. > Whether or not that becomes a WG item in DPRIVE, it reminded me that DNSOP > had not finish