[DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-salgado-dnsop-rrserial in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2021-05-28 Thread IETF Secretariat
The DNSOP WG has placed draft-salgado-dnsop-rrserial in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Tim Wicinski) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-salgado-dnsop-rrserial/ ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org h

[DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-salgado-dnsop-rrserial

2021-05-28 Thread Tim Wicinski
All We had a lot of good discussion of this draft when it first came out, and the chairs want to put up a call for adoption. If you have already stated adoption of this draft, we will count those so there is no need to repeat yourself. This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-salgado-dnsop-rrs

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-00.txt

2021-05-28 Thread Wes Hardaker
Florian Obser writes: > I did have to refresh my memory on how NSEC3PARAM works by glancing at > RFC 5155 though. Maybe something like this at the end of > "3. Best-practice for zone publishers" would be helpful: Thanks for the suggested text, added! -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI ___

Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-salgado-dnsop-rrserial in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2021-05-28 Thread John Levine
According to IETF Secretariat : > >The DNSOP WG has placed draft-salgado-dnsop-rrserial in state >Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Tim Wicinski) > >The document is available at >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-salgado-dnsop-rrserial/ I have the same reservation as last time, whil

Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-salgado-dnsop-rrserial in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2021-05-28 Thread Peter Thomassen
Hi, I like the idea of having a way to add provenance information to responses. However, as with all new proposals, I think what's needed is a careful analysis of alternative ways to achieve the same goal, then an assessment of what's the best approach (which may very well turn out to be RRSER

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-salgado-dnsop-rrserial in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2021-05-28 Thread Paul Hoffman
On May 28, 2021, at 11:30 AM, John Levine wrote: > Bonus question: why is the reply a new EDNS option rather than just adding > the SOA record to the additional section? If you do that you can add RRSIG > to show you're telling the truth. Because SOA does not now normally appear in the Additiona

Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-salgado-dnsop-rrserial in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2021-05-28 Thread Peter Thomassen
I just discovered the related thread that started in January (when I was not yet on the list) and discusses most of this. Apologies for the noise. On 5/28/21 9:27 PM, Peter Thomassen wrote: Hi, I like the idea of having a way to add provenance information to responses. However, as with all ne

[DNSOP] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-09

2021-05-28 Thread Qin Wu via Datatracker
Reviewer: Qin Wu Review result: Ready This draft defines DNS Query Name Minimisation mechanism, it is motivated by QNAME minimisation implementation lesson and experience and well documented. I believe it is ready for publication. ___ DNSOP mailing li