Re: [DNSOP] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-02

2021-05-17 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
Hi Joel, thanks for the review, please see my responses below. Joel Halpern via Datatracker writes: > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being proces

Re: [DNSOP] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-02

2021-05-17 Thread Joel Halpern Direct
Thank you Lada. I had missed the union, reading the introductory material with more attention. Glad to hear IANA did an early review. Yours, Joel On 5/17/2021 8:25 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Hi Joel, thanks for the review, please see my responses below. Joel Halpern via Datatracker writes:

[DNSOP] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-04: (with COMMENT)

2021-05-17 Thread Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to h

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

2021-05-17 Thread Brian Dickson
Here is a slightly deeper dive into this alternative scheme (for zone file/presentation and wire format), in terms of both the encoding, and the specification document itself (and as a result, the IANA components). I re-read (several times) the current -05 version of the draft. I found it difficul

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

2021-05-17 Thread Erik Nygren
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:36 PM Ben Schwartz wrote: > > > On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 12:48 PM Brian Dickson < > brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:25 AM Ben Schwartz wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:51 AM Brian Dickson < >>> brian.peter.dick.

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

2021-05-17 Thread Ben Schwartz
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 2:46 PM Brian Dickson wrote: > I re-read (several times) the current -05 version of the draft. I found it > difficult to follow and understand several aspects of the "automatically > mandatory", "mandatory", and mandatory usage in the document, both > syntactically and sem

[DNSOP] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-04: (with COMMENT)

2021-05-17 Thread Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer t

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

2021-05-17 Thread Brian Dickson
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 3:48 PM Ben Schwartz wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 2:46 PM Brian Dickson < > brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I re-read (several times) the current -05 version of the draft. I found >> it difficult to follow and understand several aspects of the "automatically