Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

2021-05-15 Thread Erik Nygren
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 4:44 PM Brian Dickson wrote: > > Having multiple AliasMode records within an RRset (with either the same or > different Priority) would provide an avenue for dealing with resolution > failure - which is one of the main reasons for any CDN customer to use > multiple CDNs, i

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

2021-05-15 Thread Brian Dickson
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:25 AM Ben Schwartz wrote: > > > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:51 AM Brian Dickson < > brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 9:33 PM Ben Schwartz wrote: >> >>> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 7:14 PM Brian Dickson < >>> brian.peter.dick...@gmail.

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

2021-05-15 Thread Brian Dickson
On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 8:00 AM Erik Nygren wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 4:44 PM Brian Dickson < > brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Having multiple AliasMode records within an RRset (with either the same >> or different Priority) would provide an avenue for dealing with resolutio