Reviewer: Valery Smyslov
Review result: Ready
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors and
Valery Smyslov via Datatracker writes:
> Reviewer: Valery Smyslov
> Review result: Ready
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For mor
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:50 AM Ben Schwartz wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 3:56 AM libor.peltan wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> just my comment:
>>
>> Perhaps complexity is subjective. The important thing is that the
>> standard be reasonably implementable. I hope that the list of published
It appears that Brian Dickson said:
>I said you weren't going to like it.
No disagreement there.
>I think it should be taken as a safe assumption, that for the vast majority
>of end users, they will either be using some kind of UI (good, bad, or
>ugly) that is (eventually) aware of the relevant
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 5:47 PM John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Brian Dickson said:
> >I said you weren't going to like it.
>
> No disagreement there.
>
> >I think it should be taken as a safe assumption, that for the vast
> majority
> >of end users, they will either be using some kind of
