Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

2021-05-09 Thread Dick Franks
On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 16:52, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > On May 7, 2021, at 3:21 AM, Pieter Lexis wrote: > > For PowerDNS, we treat the parsing of SVCParams as a two-step process. > > First we use the normal rfc1035 character decoder on the full SVCParam > > value, after which we apply the value-list

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

2021-05-09 Thread Paul Wouters
On May 9, 2021, at 08:02, Dick Franks wrote: > >  >$ORIGIN example.com >@ SVCB 1 foo > key6="\032\001\013\184\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000,\000" >; a.k.a. ipv6hint=2001:db8::5c5c:2c00 This is all pretty terrible. I agree with Tim that we should not inflict this onto th

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

2021-05-09 Thread Paul Hoffman
On May 9, 2021, at 11:26 AM, Paul Wouters wrote: > This is all pretty terrible. I agree with Tim that we should not inflict this > onto the users. Or perhaps we can already pre-allocate some CVE numbers for > the security issues this will generate. > > Keep the record simple, we are not going f

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

2021-05-09 Thread Joe Abley
On May 9, 2021, at 19:27, Paul Hoffman wrote: > If I'm wrong about this being as good as it can be, there must be an item > delimiter that is better than a comma. I am not thinking creatively enough to > figure out what might be better than a comma. I'd be happy to hear proposals > for a bette