FYI in Knot DNS, the implementation is at exactly the same state: an
existing merge request. For us, it's technically no issue if the
presentation/wire format changes during next few weeks.
I'm saying nothing about ideological consequences of such approach.
/Libor
Dne 19. 03. 21 v 0:05 Mark A
Hi,
On 3/18/21 6:42 PM, Tommy Pauly wrote:
> Personally, I’d prefer to see the name change, and not burn a codepoint,
> as long as we’re not breaking any zone files.
Agree.
> I think the question is: does anyone have a zone that has actually
> deployed the echconfig parameter? I see many respons
Hello WG,
On 3/18/21 9:53 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments.
> If this does not seem appropriate please speak out.
> If someone feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please
> speak out with your reasons.
I re-read the draft-03 last week and
No version of NSD, Unbound, ldns and getdns with SVCB and HTTPS support
has been released yet, so no problem for us to change the name of
SvcParamKey 5 to ech for us there, but ...
The Net::DNS perl library does have parsing and printing of SVCB and
HTTPS based on draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-01 si
[ Quoting in "Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-..." ]
No version of NSD, Unbound, ldns and getdns with SVCB and HTTPS support
has been released yet, so no problem for us to change the name of
SvcParamKey 5 to ech for us there, but ...
The Net::DNS perl library does have parsing and printing o
Hi Willem, Ben,
On 3/19/21 11:14 AM, Willem Toorop wrote:
> Also, it would have been nice to have some test-vectors of RR's in
> presentation format and wire format (in hexdump) in an appendix in the
> document, to assist in the creation of interoperable implementations.
> Maybe this can still be
Op 19-03-2021 om 11:19 schreef Pieter Lexis:
> Hi Willem, Ben,
>
> On 3/19/21 11:14 AM, Willem Toorop wrote:
>> Also, it would have been nice to have some test-vectors of RR's in
>> presentation format and wire format (in hexdump) in an appendix in the
>> document, to assist in the creation of int
On Thu, 2021-03-11 at 19:11 -0800, Brian Dickson wrote:
> From the status updates today, I see this draft has expired. I really like it
> (and it is quite simple), and would like to see it picked up and completed
> (adopted, rough consensus reached, published).
>
> Having reread it and the discu
On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 16:49 -0700, Brian Dickson wrote:
>
> > > Finally, what about an optional field for resolver operator contact info
> > > (e.g. vCard or similar), so the authority operator can follow up with a
> > > human if appropriate?
> >
> > Interesting idea, but it leads to packet blo
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:43 PM Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 05:38:40PM +, Jim Reid wrote:
>
> > ...
> ...
> > This could get nasty with icky CPE
> > firmware: imagine every home router in (say) Comcast’s net doing PMTU
> > to the same root server.
>
> These would gen
The Program Committee decided to extend the Call for Contributions
until 25 Mar 2021 23:59 UTC (a week from now).
Thank you if you have already submitted a proposal. We still have
capacity to accommodate a few more talks. Please, do not hesitate and
send in your suggestions.
The upcoming mileston
On 19 Mar 2021, at 02:42, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 05:38:40PM +, Jim Reid wrote:
>
>> Measuring the MTU to well-known locations on the Internet won’t be
>> appropriate for some use cases. For instance inside private nets that
>> aren’t connected to the Internet or f
Hi Willem,
On 3/19/21 11:47 AM, Willem Toorop wrote:
> That'd be nice!
PR is here [1].
> Do you also have tests for peculiar/corner and failure cases?
I'm a little bit unsure what you men with this :). The code is here[2].
I've also opened a PR updating our parser for the draft-03 changes for
m
On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 10:42 -0400, Ben Schwartz wrote:
> Does anyone have an example of test vector presentation that they like?
> Perhaps it should be structured as a pair of zone files representing the same
> zone, one in SVCB format and one in RFC 3597.
tl;dr: +1 to that
I recently impleme
14 matches
Mail list logo
