Hi Joe, thanks for your thoughtful comments.
> On 6 May 2020, at 02:18, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> Hi Roy,
>
> I have read this document and I like it.
>
> There have been other proposals to make recommendations like this in the past
> that I have not been very enthusiastic about. The reason I like
Hi John,
> On 6 May 2020, at 03:57, John Levine wrote:
>
> In article <5d255eee-4cab-44d6-8c47-bbe9c7f5c...@hopcount.ca> you write:
>>> It contains plenty of examples of how user-assigned code elements are used
>>> in the field, including
>> other ISO standards, the UN, UNICODE, CAB/forum, and
Hi Partick
> On 7 May 2020, at 19:40, Patrick Mevzek wrote:
>
> On 02/05/2020 09:09, Roy Arends wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Ed and I just submitted a new version of our private-use TLD draft.
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-arends-private-use-tld-01.txt
>
> While I do not have hard facts but jus
On 02. 05. 20 16:09, Roy Arends wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ed and I just submitted a new version of our private-use TLD draft.
>
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-arends-private-use-tld-01.txt
>
> This draft has substantial more information than the first draft. It explains
> that a private-use namespace
> On 26 May 2020, at 16:06, Petr Špaček wrote:
>
> On 02. 05. 20 16:09, Roy Arends wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Ed and I just submitted a new version of our private-use TLD draft.
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-arends-private-use-tld-01.txt
>>
>> This draft has substantial more information than
On 26. 05. 20 18:00, Roy Arends wrote:
>
>> On 26 May 2020, at 16:06, Petr Špaček wrote:
>>
>> On 02. 05. 20 16:09, Roy Arends wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Ed and I just submitted a new version of our private-use TLD draft.
>>>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-arends-private-use-tld-01.txt
>>>
>>>
On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 19:43:27 UTC Eric Orth wrote:
> One of my colleagues recently brought up the idea of suggesting recursives
> add additional HTTPSSVC records into responses for A/ queries as a way
> to make HTTPSSVC more available for cases where a stub is hesitant to make
> additional q
On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 23:56:30 UTC Ben Schwartz wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 7:06 PM Paul Vixie wrote:
> ...
>
> > and the responder knows
> > the additional data (that is, it should not make extra queries to find it
> > just
> > for additional data reasons.)
>
> The current text does not
On May 26, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Eric Orth
wrote:
> One of my colleagues recently brought up the idea of suggesting recursives
> add additional HTTPSSVC records into responses for A/ queries
Add where in the response? In the Answer section or in the Additional section?
The semantics and usefu
On 27. 05. 20 1:05, Paul Vixie wrote:
> so, this way lies madness, and the solution we see most often is a host-level
> cache of DNS results. the old INN (usenet net news) server had one of these,
> and all modern browsers have one. many of us simply run a validating
> iterative
> caching recur
10 matches
Mail list logo
