[DNSOP] [Michelle Cotton via RT] [IANA #1168741] Early Review: draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00

Hi, IANA did an early review of the draft in $subj. As you can see below, Michelle proposes that the XSLT stylesheet be removed upon publication of the RFC. I am personally not much in favour of doing so. First, I don't expect that any future changes to the stylesheet will be necessary or even

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 4:50 PM Willem Toorop wrote: > > Op 11-05-2020 om 21:38 schreef Bob Harold: > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:42 PM Tim Wicinski > > wrote: > > > > > > All, > > > > As we stated in the meeting and in our chairs actions, we're going > > to

Re: [DNSOP] [Michelle Cotton via RT] [IANA #1168741] Early Review: draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00

Hi Lada, On 13 May 2020, at 03:19, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > IANA did an early review of the draft in $subj. As you can see below, > Michelle proposes that the XSLT stylesheet be removed upon publication of the > RFC. > > I am personally not much in favour of doing so. First, I don't expect th

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones

Hi, I support adoption and will review it. Regards, Marc From: DNSOP on behalf of Tim Wicinski Date: Monday, 11 May 2020 at 19:43 To: dnsop Cc: dnsop-chairs Subject: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones All, As we stated in the meeting and in our c

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones

On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 21:24 -0400, John Levine wrote: > In article > you > write: > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption > > by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > It doesn't seem like a bad idea but I'm wondering who's likely to

Re: [DNSOP] [Michelle Cotton via RT] [IANA #1168741] Early Review: draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00

On 13. 05. 20 12:25, Joe Abley wrote: > Hi Lada, > > On 13 May 2020, at 03:19, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> IANA did an early review of the draft in $subj. As you can see below, >> Michelle proposes that the XSLT stylesheet be removed upon publication of >> the RFC. >> >> I am personally not

Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 9:00 AM Giovane C. M. Moura wrote: > > >> Do you plan to maintain the parent/child disjoint NS > >> domain (marigliano.xyz ) going forward? And what > >> about the test > >> domains for other types of misconfigurations? > > > > Great idea. Let me lo

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones

On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 13:42, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > All, > > As we stated in the meeting and in our chairs actions, we're going to run > regular call for adoptions over next few months. > We are looking for *explicit* support for adoption. > > > This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-toorop-

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones

> On May 12, 2020, at 9:43 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > Olafur > > Currently it's marked Standards Track, but I was working on the idea that the > working group would make > that decision as the document works toward Working Group Last Call. > Tim Thanks for the clarification, > I was

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-16.txt

> On 14 May 2020, at 15:48, Puneet Sood > wrote: > > Google Public DNS is planning to implement this draft in responses > from us (recursive resolver) to clients. > > *** Question: When can we expect to have an EDNS option code assigned > for the EDE option? It’s already assigned. See the IA