Hi,
As a co-author, I am supporting the draft. I believe the document is
useful to encourage enabling DNSSEC validation on resolvers.
Yours,
Daniel
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 4:29 PM Bob Harold wrote:
> Looks useful, I will review.
>
> --
> Bob Harold
>
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 3:13 PM IETF Secr
Hello, I'm still a bit skeptical.
1. Validation without logging.
At the end of 3.1 you claim that mode is still useful. When I focus on
intentional attacks, signing a malicious DS seems among the easiest
ones, and that can't be detected without the attacked machine doing
logging (the DS might be
Hi Bob,
Thanks for the comments. The new version of the file is available here [1] and
diff can be seen at [2].
I propose the following text. Does it clarify the concern ?
Avoiding the configuration file to be updated prevents old configuration file
to survive to writing error on read-only file
Hi Bob,
I apology the previous email has just been sent unexpectedly.
Thanks for the comments. The new version of the file is available here [1]
and a diff is available at [2].
I propose the following text for clarification. Feel free to let me know if
that addresses your concern.
OLD:
Not upda
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:02 PM Daniel Migault wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> I apology the previous email has just been sent unexpectedly.
>
> Thanks for the comments. The new version of the file is available here [1]
> and a diff is available at [2].
>
> I propose the following text for clarification. Fe
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Extended DNS Errors
Authors : Warren Kumari
Evan Hunt
Eric Orth writes:
> "Because long EXTRA-TEXT fields may trigger truncation, which is undesirable
> given
> the supplemental nature of EDE. Implementers and operators creating EDE
> options SHOULD avoid
> lengthy EXTRA-TEXT contents."
Thanks for pointing that out; it was indeed a failed edit a
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Extended DNS Errors'
(draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-16.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Domain Name System Operations Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Warren Kumari, Robert Wilton and Barry Leiba.
A URL
Hi Roy,
On 2 May 2020, at 10:09, Roy Arends wrote:
> Ed and I just submitted a new version of our private-use TLD draft.
>
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-arends-private-use-tld-01.txt
>
> This draft has substantial more information than the first draft. It explains
> that a private-use names
In article <5d255eee-4cab-44d6-8c47-bbe9c7f5c...@hopcount.ca> you write:
>> It contains plenty of examples of how user-assigned code elements are used
>> in the field, including
>other ISO standards, the UN, UNICODE, CAB/forum, and the IETF itself.
I also think it's an improvement, and concur wit
10 matches
Mail list logo
