[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-17.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. Title : A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate. Authors : M. Andrews

[DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc2845bis-07: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc2845bis-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

[DNSOP] Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-10: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-10: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.i

[DNSOP] DNS for Cloud Resources in draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-08

(Sorry, this is a late response to a review request original sent to the dnsop list on 11 February) Section 3.4 (DNS for Cloud Resources) includes these sentences: "Globally unique names do prevent any possibility of collision at the present or in the future and they make DNSSEC trust manageabl

Re: [DNSOP] DNS for Cloud Resources in draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-08

Yes, I believe that suggestion is much stronger and expresses the intent and meaning better. Thanks, Scott -Original Message- From: DNSOP On Behalf Of Hollenbeck, Scott Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 1:19 PM To: linda.dun...@futurewei.com Cc: dnsop@ietf.org Subject: [DNSOP] DNS for Cl

Re: [DNSOP] DNS for Cloud Resources in draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-08

On 3/11/2020 2:19 PM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: (Sorry, this is a late response to a review request original sent to the dnsop list on 11 February) Section 3.4 (DNS for Cloud Resources) includes these sentences: "Globally unique names do prevent any possibility of collision at the present or in

Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current Practice

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 6:34 PM Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > > On 11 Mar 2020, at 00:54, Warren Kumari wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 8:28 PM Warren Kumari wrote: > >> > >> [ Note: CC list edited ] > >> > >> Hi there authors, > >> > >> During the IETF LC Stephane supported the document (a

Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current Practice

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 3:44 PM Warren Kumari wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 6:34 PM Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 11 Mar 2020, at 00:54, Warren Kumari wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 8:28 PM Warren Kumari wrote: > > >> > > >> [ Note: CC list edited ] > > >> > > >> Hi

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] New Version Notification for draft-fanf-dnsop-sha-ll-not-00.txt (fwd)

In article <2914db1a-f7a3-4f1b-a2f0-da054b447...@icann.org> you write: >If we can determine when something in the realm of "almost all" DNSEC signing >with algorithms that use SHA-1 is >done, then it is reasonable for the WG to propose that software that validates >DNSSEC can stop doing so. FWIW

Re: [DNSOP] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07

Ines, thanks for your review. All, thanks for your responses. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Mar 2, 2020, at 8:18 AM, Ines Robles > wrote: > > Hi Warren, > > Thank you very much for your reply, > > Best wishes, > > Ines.. > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 8:18 PM Warren Kumari <