On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 8:55 PM Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On 9/30/19 7:09 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> > Paul Hoffman writes:
> >
> >> Saying "SHOULD NOT" without helping the reading understand the
> >> implications is dangerous and will lead to lack of
> >> interoperability. Either this document speci
Viktor Dukhovni writes:
> > On Sep 30, 2019, at 7:06 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> >
> >> Which raises another question: Can an OPT RR legitimately carry more
> >> than one EDE option, and thereby communicate multiple errors? Such as
> >> perhaps the above hypothetical with some RRSIGs expired, an
Bob Harold writes:
> > Did you read the new replacement sentence?
> >
> > Applications MUST continue to follow requirements from applicable
> > specs on how to process RCODEs no matter what EDE values is also
> > received.
> >
> > Is that sufficien
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Extended DNS Errors
Authors : Warren Kumari
Evan Hunt
internet-dra...@ietf.org writes:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System
> Operations WG of the IETF.
This version addresses, I believe, all comments from the WG LC.
--
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 04:36:02PM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> > I appears that text discussing the possibility of multiple EDE values
> > present in earlier drafts may have been inadvertently removed in -07.
> > I think such text should be restored, making it clear that the OPT
> > record may co
Subject: [DNSOP] SVCB and HTTPSSVC records: draft-nygren-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-00
Date: Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 09:17:59AM -0400 Quoting Erik Nygren
(erik+i...@nygren.org):
> Following discussions around the "HTTPSSVC" record proposal in Montreal
> with the DNSOP, HTTP and TLS WGs, we've updated what
On 9/30/19 11:47 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 7:54 AM Tony Finch wrote:
>> Difficult. In general there will be multiple upstream servers, even in
>> the simplest case of a stub talking to a recursive server talking directly
>> to authoritative servers. So there can be an arbi
