Hi,
has there been any conclusion regarding this adoption call? We tried to address
the concerns that the YANG module is a snapshot of IANA registries, but I am
not sure whether we succeeded or what should be done instead. So let me
summarize:
- After the publication of this document, IANA wil
> Il 10 agosto 2019 20:57 Wes Hardaker ha scritto:
>
> 4) Now that this has had multiple implementations (though they'll need
> to change after the packet format and code changes [that they
> requested]), this is likely ready for last call after passing through
> the document for nits and addr
Hello,
authentication of blocking decisions is an interesting idea to consider,
though it's probably beyond the scope of this RFC draft. Most
interesting cases can be already covered by securing the channels
between the first resolver that does blocking and the final stub.
On 9/4/19 2:31 PM, Vitt
Tim Wicinski has requested publication of draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv-00 as
Informational on behalf of the DNSOP working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv/
___
DNSOP mailing l
The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG
(dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'Moving DNSSEC Lookaside
Validation (DLV) to Historic Status'
as Informational RFC
Please note that this is primarily to support:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/sta
