On 23/08/2019 22:39, Joe Abley wrote:
People have always been able to anchor their non-DNS naming schemes
to domain names they control in the DNS as a way to avoid collisions,
and nobody has seemed to think that's a good idea. Is it more likely
that someone would anchor their ARTICHOKE alter
Suzanne Woolf has requested publication of draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-06 as
Proposed Standard on behalf of the DNSOP working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale/
___
DNSOP mailin
Dear experts,
Can one of you tell why would a v4 client send query or a by client
send a A query when the resolved address cannot be used?
Thanks & Regards,
Naveen
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
because the DNS systems have no idea what the application(s) will use the
answer for. remember that data (A & ) is the zone files is NOT the
same as the address(es) with which an interfce may be configured.
"Think before you ask these questions, Mitch." - Chris Knight
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at
Hi Naveen,
On 27 Aug 2019, at 20:23, Naveen Kottapalli wrote:
> Can one of you tell why would a v4 client send query or a by client send
> a A query when the resolved address cannot be used?
Sometimes you can't tell if you can use an address until you find out what it
was. You might have
>
> >> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:33 PM william manning <
> chinese.apri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > because the DNS systems have no idea what the application(s) will use
> the answer for.
> > remember that data (A & ) is the zone files is NOT the same as the
> address(es)
> > with which an interfc
