Re: [DNSOP] Proposal: Whois over DNS

2019-07-11 Thread Michele Neylon - Blacknight
All gTLD registries and registrars will be obliged to use RDAP from next month onwards. At present all gTLD registries and registrars follow a consistent format for their whois output which is mandated under their respective contracts. Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions

Re: [DNSOP] Proposal: Whois over DNS

2019-07-11 Thread Dr Eberhard W Lisse
And many ccTLDs will follow suit anyway :-)-O el On 11/07/2019 11:59, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote: > All gTLD registries and registrars will be obliged to use RDAP from > next month onwards. > > At present all gTLD registries and registrars follow a consistent > format for their whois outp

Re: [DNSOP] Proposal: Whois over DNS

2019-07-11 Thread Michele Neylon - Blacknight
It will have whatever contact data has been decided under ICANN policy and the registrar / registry’s own policies etc., As Dr Lisse pointed out, some ccTLDs will probably follow suit. As with any network connected service there will be some rate limits, though unless you’re being abusive they

Re: [DNSOP] FYI: draft-andrews-dnsop-defeat-frag-attack

2019-07-11 Thread Bob Harold
Thanks for explaining that. I leave it up to you if a comment to that affect in the draft would avoid the same question in the future. -- Bob Harold On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 5:12 PM Mark Andrews wrote: > is the base64 encoding of 3 zero octet. If named was using a hex > encoding it would

[DNSOP] DNS topics at MAPRG meeting, IETF 105 Montreal, Friday morning

2019-07-11 Thread Dave Plonka
Hi folks, Please note that the Measurement and Analysis for Protocols Research Group (MAPRG) has arranged for presentation of a measurement contributions pertinent to DNS engineering and/or operation at our upcoming meeting during IETF 105 in Montreal: * Understanding Evolution and Adoption of T

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: [Add] new draft: draft-grover-add-policy-detection-00

2019-07-11 Thread Paul Vixie
On Monday, 8 July 2019 18:36:07 UTC Andy Grover wrote: > Hi all, > > FYI from the ADD list, please post there or to the authors with feedback. andy, thanks for this, it seems well intentioned and well executed. three small nits: > One way to implement content control that does not rely on softw

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Request for adoption: draft-sah-resolver-information

2019-07-11 Thread Paul Wouters
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019, Paul Hoffman wrote: Comment> If the stub resolver is already using DoH with the recursive resolver, why does it have to determine the URI template of the DoH server? One example is that the stub or browser may want to change DoH servers, such as if it has discovered one