Re: [DNSOP] Variant bad idea of the day

2019-01-01 Thread John R Levine
If you get a request that include any of the code points {n1, n2,...}, return a CNAME where nM is replaced with foo? Not just at foo, but do the same thing on any name under foo. The idea is to publish the LGR for the subtree and the server can handle all of the variants from one zone. Rega

Re: [DNSOP] Variant bad idea of the day

2019-01-01 Thread Patrik Fältström
On 1 Jan 2019, at 18:00, John R Levine wrote: >> If you get a request that include any of the code points {n1, n2,...}, >> return a CNAME where nM is replaced with foo? > > Not just at foo, but do the same thing on any name under foo. The idea is to > publish the LGR for the subtree and the ser

Re: [DNSOP] Variant bad idea of the day

2019-01-01 Thread John R Levine
On Tue, 1 Jan 2019, Patrik Fältström wrote: Not just at foo, but do the same thing on any name under foo. The idea is to publish the LGR for the subtree and the server can handle all of the variants from one zone. Got it. As long as the query reaches this server of course. You also mean aut