Joe Abley writes:
> On 13 Nov 2018, at 14:07, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
>> Paul Wouters writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>>>
we would like to ask the working group to adopt the following I-D as a
WG item:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lhotka-d
On Nov 14, 2018, at 12:02, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> The thing is that we want IANA to perform further updates on their own,
> and the instructions in the "IANA Considerations" section are intended
> to be one way: if the registry changes, update the module so and so. It
> would become more compli
Hi Paul and DNSOP WG,
thanks for working on this.
comments inline:
>It is important to note that the design described in this document is
>controversial.
Is it still considered "controversial" to mirror the root zone locally given
that
some big operators do this in practice or is this
nusenu:
> auth-zone:
> name: "."
> master: "b.root-servers.net
> master: "c.root-servers.net
> master: "d.root-servers.net
> master: "f.root-servers.net
> master: "g.root-servers.net
> master: "k.root-servers.net
> fallback-enabled: yes
> for-
