Hi,
we would like to ask the working group to adopt the following I-D as a
WG item:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00
Let me emphasize again that the adoption doesn't mean any long-term
commitment and burden for the WG: this document only provides an initial
Hi Ladislav,
On 12 Nov 2018, at 12:31, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> we would like to ask the working group to adopt the following I-D as a
> WG item:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00
I have read this document, and I actually can't think of anything that wo
On Mon, 2018-11-12 at 12:37 +0200, Joe Abley wrote:
> Hi Ladislav,
>
> On 12 Nov 2018, at 12:31, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > we would like to ask the working group to adopt the following I-D as a
> > WG item:
> >
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00
>
> I
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
we would like to ask the working group to adopt the following I-D as a
WG item:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00
I'll leave that call up to the chairs bit it sounds like a good idea.
I have reviewed the documen
> On 13 Nov 2018, at 5:03 pm, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
>> we would like to ask the working group to adopt the following I-D as a
>> WG item:
>>
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00
>
> I'll leave that call up t
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Mark Andrews wrote:
DLV 32769 DNSSEC Lookaside Validation
DLV isn’t obsolete. The registry ISC published is gone but anyone can publish
their own
registry.
The question is if that is a bug or feature. I think it is a bug and its
time for the code base to remove t
