Thanks Paul!
I'm very happy with all the proposed formulation changes (your commit
0fqxn1k41).
--Vladimir
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> for QTYPE=A, add as a desired additional data type.
>
> for QTYPE=, add A as a desired additional data type.
How does the server signal to a client that made an A query that there
are no records so the client does not need to make a followup
query? My answ
Hi,
> On 2 Jul 2018, at 11:53, Tony Finch wrote:
>
> Paul Vixie wrote:
>>
>> for QTYPE=A, add as a desired additional data type.
>>
>> for QTYPE=, add A as a desired additional data type.
>
> How does the server signal to a client that made an A query that there
> are no record
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : DNS Multiple QTYPEs
Author : Ray Bellis
Filename: draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qt
> On Jun 29, 2018, at 12:38 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
>
>
> Michael Sheldon wrote:
>> Breaking this out of the ANAME discussion, since it has wider use.
>>
>> I've been thinking on this one. If I was to create a record, I'd set
>> aside a byte or two at the beginning to denote family, but I'm
This is conceptually similar to [accompanying-questions], but limits all
questions to share a QNAME. The result is a more concise payload and
simpler processing logic at the expense of an ability to request e.g.
(www.example.com, A) and (_443._tcp.www.example.com, TLSA) in one query.
I can imag
On Mon, 2 Jul 2018, Jared Mauch wrote:
As a longtime ANY (ab)user, I welcome an approach where we get + A at the
same time. This can be done by just returning the additional but it really
depends on if the clients or stubs will use it.
If you are trusting an unsigned A record in the an
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : BULK DNS Resource Records
Authors : John Woodworth
Dean Ballew
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : DNS Stateful Operations
Authors : Ray Bellis
Stuart Cheshire
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Extended DNS Errors
Authors : Warren Kumari
Evan Hunt
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : A Root Key Trust Anchor Sentinel for DNSSEC
Authors : Geoff Huston
Jo
Firstly, thank you! (for keeping the WG informed, I met with Joe in Panama
and thanked him then too).
I generally like to update at least the GitHub version during WGLC so that
people can better see the current state, but this time travel and such got
in the way. I have integrated / addressed most
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : An Proxy Use Case of DNS over HTTPS
Authors : Linjian Song
Paul Vixie
On 2 July 2018 at 00:03, Paul Hoffman wrote
>8
> Well, RFC 1035 *does* say that it is in ASCII, whether we like that or not.
Perhaps we need to remind ourselves what RFC1035 actually *does* say.
ASCII is mentioned in three places only:
2.3.3 para 1, initially about case-insensitive characte
14 matches
Mail list logo
