On 27.1.2018 18:56, Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 02:24:26PM -0600, Ted Lemon wrote:
>>
Disagreed, with respect to recursive resolvers, because the
requirement is neither necessary nor sufficient to achieve th
Dear colleagues,
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:18:08AM -0500, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is the opening of the Working Group Last Call for "Let 'localhost' be
> localhost”
> (https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost-02.txt).
>
I have read this document.
L
On Jan 29, 2018, at 10:53 AM, dnsop-requ...@ietf.org wrote:
> To add more to this, Unbound by default returns 127.0.0.1, and so does
> Knot Resolver, because both decided to respect
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6761#section-6.3
>
> This is a security hole, and again, purpose of NXDOMAIN is t
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 05:32:33PM +0100, Petr Špaček wrote:
> I personally agree with the doc, it makes sense to me, and I do not
> believe that its wording prevent anyone from adding knobs they want.
> Software in the end will do whatever its developers wanted, which might
> include knob to overr
chiming in for the hum:
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
Dear colleagues,
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:18:08AM -0500, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
Hi all,
This is the opening of the Working Group Last Call for "Let 'localhost' be
localhost”
(https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost-0
On 27 Jan 2018, at 18:16, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Greetings. The -05 draft still has a complexity that I can can be easily
> fixed. In a few places, it says that a session can be established by the
> client sending a response-requiring DSO request message. For example, from
> section 4.1:
> A
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:01 AM, Robert Story wrote:
> On Mon 2017-11-13 18:26:02-0800 internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System
>> Operations WG of the IETF.
>
> I was r
Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> Yes, you are right -- for all places where there is 'A' it should be
> 'A or '; how do people feel about something along the lines of:
>
> "Throughout this document, we are using A to refer to an Address
> record (either 'A' or '') " -- having "A or " scatter
Warren Kumari writes:
> "Throughout this document, we are using A to refer to an Address
> record (either 'A' or '') " -- having "A or " scattered all
> over the document makes it now flow as nicely...
Just for fun, turn that around: "Throughout this document, we are
using ... e
Indeed, the concept of "address record" has also come up in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-aname-01 , which even
suggests (but does not specify) the creation of an IANA registry.
On 01/29/2018 05:37 PM, Martin Hoffmann wrote:
Warren Kumari wrote:
Yes, you are right -- for all p
10 matches
Mail list logo
