1 something. I also believe it should scale as to the size of the
subscription base in some way. Basically, this should answer the question
of “ given a set of subscribers of size N, a per request failure rate of f,
a retry time of R, how long do you have to wait until P% of the subscribers
have
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 1:38 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
> > Hi Bob,
> >
> > On Nov 15, 2017, at 00:23, Bob Harold wrote:
> >
> > If I have to add those entries to each zone, I worry that the automated
> DNS
> > appliance that I use might not be
At Thu, 16 Nov 2017 22:02:33 -0800,
Paul Vixie wrote:
> > Realistically, I expect virtually everyone will implement 3, given how
> > this kind of feature is sold in the marketing context. ,,,
>
> me too. that's why, in:
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zRuuXkwmklMHFvl_Qqzn2N0SOGY/
In the SPASM group, we are refining CAA (RFC 6844) based on the changes
that were needed in order to get it passed at the CA/Browser Forum.
There's one sticky bit in particular I'd like input on. Here's the
current language in the BRs:
https://cabforum.org/wp-content/uploads/CA-Browser-Forum-BR-1.
神明達哉 wrote:
At Thu, 16 Nov 2017 22:02:33 -0800,
Paul Vixie wrote:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zRuuXkwmklMHFvl_Qqzn2N0SOGY/?qid=ff8e732c964b76fed3bbf333b89b111f
...i wrote:
therefore a "serve stale" team within IETF-DNSOP was convened, to try to
standardize the methods and
