Re: [DNSOP] 答复: 答复: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-song-atr-large-resp-00.txt

2017-09-22 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 07:31:29PM -0700, Paul Vixie wrote: > we can, if we wish, continue to standardize one protocol, watch as the world > deploys a different one, and still pretent that our effort was worthwhile. > however, this would fit the technical definition of "insanity", and i urge > that

Re: [DNSOP] 答复: 答复: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-song-atr-large-resp-00.txt

2017-09-22 Thread P Vix
On September 22, 2017 9:58:42 AM EDT, Andrew Sullivan wrote: >On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 07:31:29PM -0700, Paul Vixie wrote: > >[…] > >> we need a kernel option for various open source operating systems >which >> causes all UDP to be fragmented at 512 octets of payload. > >If working on a protocol