Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes

2017-07-08 Thread Phillip Hallam-Baker
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:15 AM, John C Klensin wrote: > > > --On Thursday, July 6, 2017 00:36 -0400 Phillip Hallam-Baker > wrote: > > > There are changes to the DNS that are practical and those that > > are not. For better or worse, I can't see any way that > > teaching DNS to use new classes m

Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes

2017-07-08 Thread Pete Resnick
On 7 Jul 2017, at 19:18, Mark Andrews wrote: In message , Pete Resnick writes: On 6 Jul 2017, at 16:52, Mark Andrews wrote: Or you could stop trying to reinforce the myth that new RR types are hard to deploy. They really aren't. They actually get used all the time. I'm running the latest

Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes

2017-07-08 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Pete Resnic k writes: > On 7 Jul 2017, at 19:18, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > In message , > > Pete Resnick writes: > >> > >> On 6 Jul 2017, at 16:52, Mark Andrews wrote: > >> > >>> Or you could stop trying to reinforce the myth that new RR types > >>> are hard to deploy. They really

Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes

2017-07-08 Thread Nico Williams
On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 11:58:51AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: > One can do something similar in any scripting language. Sure. The people on this list can, and many others too. Still, all of us together are a tiny proportion of the users that would need to be able to. > So no it isn't hard to us