Re: [DNSOP] DNS-Server distribution statistics

2017-02-12 Thread Paul Hoffman
On 11 Feb 2017, at 17:49, Allan Liska wrote: ISC runs a monthly survey of DNS statistics: https://ftp.isc.org/www/survey/reports/current/fpdns.txt (this is from January 2017). Information about the survey is here: https://ftp.isc.org/www/survey/reports/current/survey.html Not sure how useful the

Re: [DNSOP] DNS-Server distribution statistics

2017-02-12 Thread Woodworth, John R
-Original Message- From: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Hoffman > > On 11 Feb 2017, at 17:49, Allan Liska wrote: > > > ISC runs a monthly survey of DNS statistics: > > https://ftp.isc.org/www/survey/reports/current/fpdns.txt (this is from > > January 2017). > > Info

Re: [DNSOP] DNS-Server distribution statistics

2017-02-12 Thread George Michaelson
I have never entirely got with the people who think obscuring version information is necessary and correct. Designing for the bad actors presupposes they will somehow magically not attack you, simply because you obscured the version info. Root ops (I may misremember) stand out in my mind as a grou

Re: [DNSOP] DNS-Server distribution statistics

2017-02-12 Thread Warren Kumari
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 5:44 PM, George Michaelson wrote: > I have never entirely got with the people who think obscuring version > information is necessary and correct. Designing for the bad actors > presupposes they will somehow magically not attack you, simply because > you obscured the version

Re: [DNSOP] DNS-Server distribution statistics

2017-02-12 Thread william manning
which is why, Warren, that modern fingerprinting does not rely on what the server lies about. /W On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 5:44 PM, George Michaelson > wrote: > > I have never entirely got with the people who think obscuring version > > inf